rss
Qual Health Care 2000;9:83 doi:10.1136/qhc.9.2.83
  • Editorial

Managing quality in primary health care: the need for valid information about performance

  1. Richard Baker
  1. Clinical Governance Research and Development Unit, Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK rb14@le.ac.uk

      Information about the quality of care is essential if quality is to be managed effectively, but information is difficult to come by in primary care. Systems for providing primary health care services vary from country to country. Depending on the country, the providers of care may be general practitioners, family physicians, specialists working in the community, or nurses. They may work in solo practices or in large, multi-professional groups or even teams, and may or may not be integrated with social and community services. They may or may not have a gatekeeper function to secondary care, and methods of funding primary health care vary from payment by the patient alone to payment by the state alone, with all manner of combinations between these extremes. It could be argued that the defining characteristic of national health care systems is the method of providing primary health care.

      After years of neglect, governments and funding agencies in many countries have become interested in the potential of primary health care to …

      Register for free content

      The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

      Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.